yucks!but i dun mind cute girls though :P
see Robin! - u are a bad bad influence and happy is now posting naughty pics!at the rate she is going, i'm gonna put on weight munching sandwiches all day long ...
FH2o, I am not posting naughty pictures. On the contrary, this is a beautiful work of art unlike the cats in Kuching, duh! I think we should look at such things from the art perspective. There are lots of works of art that feature nudity. Would you say the Statue of David by Michelangelo or the Venus statue repulsive?Besides, you got it all wrong. You shouldn't be needing sandwiches, right Robin?Jellyfish, at least you're kinder.Thank you.
the statues do not move, dangle, juggle nor jiggle!ok ok; i'll be kinder - naughty but interesting pictures. thanks for sharing your astute artistic vision!better now? ;)
LOL!! OK, you got me there. Statues don't move, dangle, juggle nor jiggle! Still.
u r welcomekekekekee....
For what it's worth, Happysurfer, I thought it was clever.
do they have their undies on?
See seee... this water people dun know Arts one,.,haha... not influence by me wor.. unless you count the voting post as obsence..hahaha
winn - try rinsing your eyes with 'winn' first and then look closely at the guy especially between his legs ... the er, dangling bit, aiyo u ha!
MM, I'll take 'clever'. Okay, you can stop there.Winn, are you sure you're not using that detergent of yours again?Robin, ya lor - so swaku one-er! People, thanks for the laugh though art is no laughing matter, okay?
Wow. Lipstick on the collar used to be incriminating. Imagine what the result of this could be in that regard.
...and please someone tell them not to stand so close to the fruit stand. ewww....
In case the fruits get incriminated?! haha.... Pandabonium, that's so funny. LOL!!
A thought came into my mind.. imagine if the guy suddenly got horny..